Care Management Program Description: Strategies for Effective Implementation

Introduction

In today’s evolving healthcare landscape, the pursuit of the “Triple Aim” – enhancing patient care experiences, improving population health, and reducing healthcare costs – is paramount. A cornerstone in achieving these objectives is effective population health management, and care management (CM) stands out as a vital, practice-based approach. This article delves into the essential strategies for developing and enhancing care management programs, aiming to provide a comprehensive Care Management Program Description and actionable insights for healthcare professionals and policymakers.

Care management is not merely about managing illnesses; it’s a proactive, patient-centered strategy focused on providing the right interventions to individuals within a defined population. This approach is designed to mitigate health risks and optimize healthcare expenditure. Unlike case management, which often centers on specific diseases and is typically administered by health plans, care management adopts a broader perspective, emphasizing proactive and tailored interventions to improve overall population health.

This discussion is informed by extensive research, including insights from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Transforming Primary Care grants. These initiatives have explored innovative methods to enhance primary care delivery across diverse practice settings. Drawing upon these findings, coupled with broader literature and practical experience, we present key strategies to bolster care management programs. These strategies are crucial for healthcare practices aiming to refine their services and for policymakers seeking to promote effective healthcare delivery.

Despite the increasing adoption of care management programs, optimizing their implementation and financial sustainability remains a challenge. Traditional fee-for-service models often fail to adequately compensate for the essential care coordination and management services, particularly for patients with complex and multiple conditions. However, the tide is turning with payment reform initiatives recognizing the value of care management. Transitional care management billing codes and chronic care management codes represent steps towards incentivizing and reimbursing these crucial services. Both governmental and private payers are increasingly supporting care management, either through direct service payments or by rewarding programs that demonstrate positive outcomes. Initiatives like the CMS Comprehensive Primary Care initiative and the Patient-Centered Primary Care Collaborative underscore the growing recognition of care management as a fundamental component of effective, patient-centered healthcare.

This article will explore three pivotal strategies for enhancing care management programs:

1. Identifying Populations with Modifiable Risks: Crucial for targeted and effective intervention.
2. Aligning Care Management Services to Population Needs: Ensuring services are relevant and impactful.
3. Identifying and Training Appropriate Personnel: Building a capable and effective care management workforce.

By focusing on these strategies, healthcare providers, administrators, and policymakers can gain valuable insights to guide the implementation and refinement of care management programs, ultimately contributing to the overarching goals of improved healthcare quality, enhanced patient experience, and reduced costs.

Strategy 1: Identifying Populations with Modifiable Risks

Effective care management hinges on the ability to pinpoint populations that stand to benefit most from targeted interventions. Modifiable risks, those factors that individuals can control to improve their health and well-being, are central to this strategy. While all patients benefit from basic care coordination, identifying those with modifiable risks is crucial for optimizing resource allocation and delivering impactful care management services, especially for high-risk and high-cost patient segments.

To sustainably manage healthcare resources, practices must accurately identify individuals and populations where risk factors can be modified to achieve tangible health improvements. Strategic care management for these populations can enhance care quality, improve safety, and boost efficiency. Consider, for instance, individuals at risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Lifestyle modifications such as diet and exercise can significantly impact their risk trajectory. By recognizing this “rising risk” population and understanding their readiness to change, providers can tailor interventions to match individual needs and circumstances, optimizing the effectiveness of care management efforts.

Transitions of care, particularly between hospitals and primary care settings, present significant risks for adverse events and increased healthcare costs. Identifying high-risk transitions and targeting care management services to patients undergoing these transitions is a strategic approach to improve outcomes and conserve resources.

Modifying risk extends beyond addressing unhealthy behaviors. It encompasses improving health outcomes, addressing psychosocial factors, and supporting patients in achieving their health goals. Factors such as ethnicity, age, metabolic risk factors, smoking status, chronic disease burden, and psychosocial issues like caregiver support availability are valuable indicators for identifying individuals who could benefit from care management programs. Understanding these variables aids in designing tailored support systems to help patients achieve their personal health objectives. Even when risks appear non-modifiable, care coordination remains beneficial, streamlining services, clarifying roles, and preventing service duplication.

The need for care management can also be triggered by gaps in adherence to evidence-based care guidelines or by significant health events such as hospitalizations. Once a need is identified, engaging patients and caregivers in shared decision-making is essential to determine the most appropriate care management services to address their modifiable risks and optimize their health outcomes.

To support these efforts, health policies should broaden eligibility criteria for care management services, recognizing that diverse services can cater to varied patient needs. Establishing clear metrics to assess care management needs and outcomes is crucial for evaluating program success. Value-based payment models, incorporating state and federal tax incentives, can further incentivize practices to achieve the Triple Aim through effective care management.

Future research should focus on quantifying the benefits of care management strategies across different patient segments. This includes investigating the reduction of emergency department visits and hospital readmissions, the decrease in medication errors, and the enhancement of patient engagement in self-management. Further exploration is needed to fully understand the spectrum of modifiable risks and to refine risk stratification tools and predictive models, enhancing their utility in identifying populations that will benefit most from targeted care management interventions.

Strategy 2: Aligning Care Management Services to the Needs of the Population

The effectiveness of care management programs significantly depends on how well services are aligned with the specific needs of the target population. This alignment fosters a supportive and trusting relationship between healthcare providers and patients, a cornerstone of successful primary care and care management delivery. By tailoring services to individual patient needs and preferences, care management programs can strengthen the patient-provider relationship and extend that relationship to the broader care team.

Key services in care management, particularly when aligned with population needs, include:

Coordination of Care

Care coordination is a fundamental aspect of routine primary care, yet its specific requirements vary significantly among populations and individuals. For high-risk or high-cost populations, personalized care plans are essential for coordinating care across multiple providers. Additional services such as specialty referral coordination, assistance with ancillary services, and connections to community resources are also crucial for these populations. Effective care coordination ensures seamless transitions and reduces fragmentation, leading to better patient outcomes and efficient resource utilization.

Self-Management Support

Self-management support is especially critical for patients managing chronic conditions and those with emerging modifiable risks. Understanding a patient’s readiness to adopt lifestyle changes and their level of activation is key to tailoring effective support. Care managers can employ techniques like motivational interviewing to help patients set achievable goals, track their progress, and enhance their ability to self-manage their conditions. Empowering patients to take an active role in their health management is vital for long-term success and improved health outcomes.

Outreach

Proactive outreach is a vital care management service, particularly for patients with chronic conditions and those undergoing care transitions. Maintaining contact with patients listed in disease registries facilitates ongoing outreach and the delivery of necessary follow-up services. For patients transitioning from hospital to home, phone calls and follow-up communication can ensure reconnection with their primary care providers and significantly reduce the risk of hospital readmission. Drawing from evidence-based models like Coleman’s “Four Pillars”® of effective transitional care, outreach calls should address medication management, recognition of warning signs, address unanswered questions from hospitalization, and ensure appropriate follow-up appointments with primary care and specialists.

Within these care management functions, essential clinical tasks such as medication reconciliation, treatment plan adherence assessments, and adverse event monitoring are crucial. These interventions facilitate timely treatment adjustments and mobilize clinic support when needed, ensuring patient safety and optimal care.

To incentivize these vital care coordination, self-management support, and outreach activities, financial incentives are essential. Private payers can emulate CMS by adopting incentives for care management and chronic care management activities. Both public and private payers should consider additional financial incentives to promote self-management support. Policies that reward practices for achieving the Triple Aim can ensure the financial sustainability of care management programs. Beyond monetary incentives, payers can also provide non-financial support such as coaching, learning collaboratives, and coordinated care management services, working in partnership with healthcare practices.

To further optimize the alignment of care management services, research is needed to explore the development and implementation of these services across the broader medical neighborhood, including long-term care services and supports. The current landscape often sees overlapping care management services, particularly in long-term care, leading to inefficiencies, role confusion, and potential errors. Research should evaluate initiatives aimed at fostering better care alignment across different providers and settings, ensuring seamless and effective care delivery for patients.

Strategy 3: Identifying and Training Personnel Appropriate to the Needed CM Services

The success of a care management program is intrinsically linked to the capabilities and training of its personnel. The specific roles and required expertise within a care management team should be determined by the target population’s clinical and psychosocial needs, as well as the resources available within the practice setting. Different care management services may necessitate varying skill sets. For example, clinical pharmacists are highly trained in medication reconciliation, while social workers excel in assessing psychosocial needs and connecting patients with community resources.

While there may be overlaps in skill sets among care management staff – for instance, both nurses and social workers can effectively coordinate care, provide self-management support, and conduct transition outreach – the optimal deployment of personnel depends on a clear understanding of patient needs and the specific services required.

Practices must decide whether to hire dedicated care managers or distribute care management functions among existing staff. Dedicated care managers come from diverse backgrounds, including nursing, social work, pharmacy, and health coaching. The assignment of clinically focused care management services, such as medication reconciliation, should be based on the individual’s training and licensure.

Resource constraints, particularly in smaller practices, may necessitate distributing care management responsibilities among existing personnel. While the fee-for-service payment model may initially limit the ability of resource-constrained practices to align staffing with patient needs, value-based payment models offer a more financially sustainable approach to care management staffing.

Effective care management requires matching the right person to the right task. Individuals in care management roles must build trust with patients and collaborate effectively with the care team. Strong interpersonal skills are paramount. Furthermore, the clinic culture must be receptive to integrating care management personnel, which may require a shift from traditional provider-centric models to a more team-based approach.

This team-based approach represents a significant departure from traditional, disease-oriented, and provider-centric care models. As care management functions are integrated, the roles of physicians and other team members may evolve. Sustainable integration of care management is most likely when accompanied by broader practice transformation encompassing workforce and workflow redesign.

To foster this transformation, incentives such as loans or tuition subsidies should support training in team-based, coordinated care models, including care management. Training programs should emphasize core competencies in care management, regardless of the learner’s prior background. Developing care management certification programs can further recognize and validate functional expertise.

Research should guide care management training by identifying team-building activities that best support effective service delivery. While workflow optimization in primary care teams is an area of study, evidence suggests that optimal workflows are context-specific. Therefore, ongoing research is needed to identify best practices for workflow integration as practices adopt care management services. Interprofessional education must be integrated into the training of all healthcare professionals to cultivate interprofessional practice values, understanding of diverse roles, effective communication, and high-performing teamwork. Without these core competencies, achieving the cultural shift needed to fully embrace care management services will be challenging.

Conclusion

The rise of care management reflects a profound transformation in U.S. healthcare delivery and payment systems over the past decade. Care management represents a patient-centered, team-based strategy designed to address the increasing complexity of outpatient care. It is both an innovation in care processes, introducing new models and services, and a workforce innovation, integrating new members into the care team. This article underscores care management as a crucial tool for managing population health.

By focusing on the three key strategies outlined – identifying populations with modifiable risks, aligning care management services to population needs, and appropriately identifying and training personnel – healthcare practices and policymakers can effectively implement and enhance care management programs. While significant progress has been made, ongoing research is essential to determine the most effective care management services, their optimal deployment contexts, and best implementation practices. Through the dedicated efforts of healthcare practices and the supportive policies of payers and government, particularly through value-based payment models and incentives aligned with the Triple Aim, achieving improved population health management is within reach.

This article provides a care management program description grounded in research and best practices, aiming to serve as a valuable resource for those committed to advancing healthcare delivery and improving patient outcomes.

References

1. Berwick DM, Nolan TW, Whittington J. The triple aim: care, health and cost. Health Affairs 2008; 27(3):765-9.
2. Taylor EF, Machta RM, Meyers DS, Genevro J, Peikes DN. Enhancing the primary care team to provide redesigned care: the roles of practice facilitators and care managers. Ann Fam Med 2013; 11(1):80-3.
3. Centers for healthcare strategies. Care management definition and framework (2007). http://www.chcs.org/resource/care-management-definition-and-framework/
4. Tomoaia-Cotisel A, Farrell TW, Solberg LI et al. Implementation of care management: a narrative synthesis of recent AHRQ research [Under Review.]
5. Scholle S, Asche SE, Morton S, Solberg LI, Tirodkar MA, Jaén CR. Support and strategies for change among small patient-centered medical home practices. Ann Fam Med 2013; 11:S6-13.
6. Dohan D, McCuistion MN, Frosch DL, Hung DY, Tai-Seale M. Recognition as a patient-centered medical home: fundamental or incidental? Ann Fam Med 2013; 11: S14-S18.
7. Reid RJ, Johnson EA, Hsu C, Ehrlich K, Coleman K, Trescott C, Erikson M, Ross TR, Liss DT, Cromp D, and Fishman PA. Spreading a medical home redesign: effects on emergency department use and hospital admissions. Ann Fam Med 2013; 11:S19-26.
8. Donahue KE, Halladay JR, Wise A, Reiter K, Lee SY, Ward K, Mitchell M, Qaqish B. Facilitators of Transforming Primary Care: a look under the hood at practice leadership. Ann Fam Med 2013; 11:S27-33.
9. Driscoll DL, Hiratsuka V, Johnston JM, Norman S, Reilly KM, Shaw J, Smith J, Szafran QN, Dillard D. Process and outcomes of patient-centered medical care with Alaska native people at Southcentral Foundation. Ann Fam Med 2013; 11:S41-9.
10. Day J, Scammon DL, Kim J, Sheets-Mervis A, Day R, Tomoaia-Cotisel A, Waitzman NJ, Magill MK. Quality, satisfaction, and financial efficiency associated with elements of primary care practice transformation: preliminary findings. Ann Fam Med 2013; 11:S50-9.
11. Calman NS, Hauser D, Weiss L, Waltermaurer E, Molina-Ortiz E, Chantarat T, Bozack A. Becoming a patient-centered medical home: a 9-year transition for a network of federally qualified health centers. Ann Fam Med 2013; 11:S68-73.
12. Alexander JA, Paustian M, Wise CG, Green LA, Fetters MD, Mason M, El Reda DK. Assessment and measurement of patient-centered medical home implementation: the BCBSM experience. Ann Fam Med 2013; 11:S74-81.
13. Berry CA, Mijanovich T, Albert S, Winther CH, Paul MM, Ryan MS, McCullough C, Shih SH. Patientcentered medical home among small urban practices serving low-income and disadvantaged patients. Ann Fam Med 2013; 11:S82-9.
14. McAllister JW, Cooley WC, Van Cleave J, Boudreau AA, Kuhlthau K. Medical home transformation in pediatric primary care—what drives change? Ann Fam Med 2013; 11:S90-8.
15. Gabbay RA, Friedberg MW, Miller-Day M, Cronholm PF, Adelman A, Schneider EC. A positive deviance approach to understanding key features to improving diabetes care in the medical home. Ann Fam Med 2013; 11:S99-107.
16. Solberg LI, Crain AL, Tillema J, Scholle SH, Fontaine P, Whitebird R. Medical home transformation: a gradual process and a continuum of attainment. Ann Fam Med 2013; 11:S109-14.
17. Rich E, Lipson D, Libersky J, Parchman M. Coordinating care for adults with complex care needs in the Patient-Centered Medical Home: challenges and solutions. White paper (prepared by Mathematica Policy Research under Contract No. HHSA290200900019I/HHSA29032005T). AHRQ Publication No. 12-0010-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. January 2012.
18. Medicare learning network: Transitional care management codes. http://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and– Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/Downloads/Transitional-Care-Management- Services-Fact-Sheet-ICN908628.pdf
19. CMS fact sheet: policy and payment changes to the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule for 2015. http://cms.gov/Newsroom/MediaReleaseDatabase/Fact-sheets/2014-Fact-sheets-items/2014-10-31-7.html
20. CMS comprehensive primary care initiative. http://innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/comprehensive-primary-care-initiative/.
21. Shaljian M, Nielsen M. Managing populations, maximizing technology: population health management in the medical neighborhood. Patient-Centered Primary Care Collaborative (2013).
22. Achieving person-centered care through care coordination. The SCAN Foundation. Policy brief No. 8 (December 2013). http://thescanfoundation.org/achieving-person-centered-care-through-care-coordination
23. Health professions education: a bridge to quality. Institute of Medicine (2003). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK221528/
24. Edington D. Emerging research: a view from one research center. Am J Health Promot 2001; 15(5):341-9.
25. Kripalani S, Jackson AT, Schnipper JL, Coleman EA. Promoting effective transitions of care at hospital discharge: a review of key issues for hospitalists. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2007; 2(5):314-23.
26. Farrell TW, Tomoaia-Cotisel A, Scammon D, et al. Impact of an integrated transitions management program in primary care on hospital readmissions. J Healthc Qual 2015;37(1):81-92.
27. Coleman EA, Smith JD, Frank JC, et al. Preparing patients and caregivers to participate in care delivered across settings: The Care Transitions Intervention. J Am Geriatr Soc; 52(11):1817-25.
28. Variation in health care spending: target decision making, not geography. Institute of Medicine (2013). https://www.nap.edu/read/18393/chapter/1.
29. Peikes DN, Reid RJ, Day TJ, Cornwell DD, Dale SB, Baron RJ, Brown RS, Shapiro RJ. Staffing patterns of primary care practices in the comprehensive primary care initiative. Ann Fam Med 2014; 12(2):142-9.
30. Hoff T. Medical home implementation: a taxonomy of hard and soft best practices. Milbank Q 2013; 91(4):771-810.
31. Tomoaia-Cotisel A, Scammon DL, Waitzman NJ et al. Context matters: the experience of 14 research teams in systematically reporting contextual factors important for practice change. Ann Fam Med. 2013; 11 (Suppl1):S115-S123.
32. Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: report of an expert panel. Interprofessional Education Collaborative Expert Panel (2011).
33. Friedman A, Hahn KA, Etz R. A typology of primary care workforce innovations in the United States since 2000. Med Care 2014; 52(2):101-11.